dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT060399P8
Roles of Dissolution Testing:
Regulatory, Industry and Academic Perspectives
-Role of Dissolution Testing in Pharmaceutical Industry

Martin Siewert
Hoechst Marion Roussel, AG, Frankfurt, Germany
 
Dissolution testing in pharmaceutical industry is a very important tool in drug development and in quality control. While traditionally developed for solid oral dosage forms, in the last years, the use of dissolution testing has been widened to a variety of dosage forms, such as semi-solid or parenteral (e.g. implant) preparations.
Scientifically, a lot of progress has been made through more than three decades. Also, from the perspective of (pharmacopoeial) standardization, international harmonization of regulations, and thus consistent concepts and test methods being applied around the world, we have reached a high level.
Does that mean that we have no more questions, no more issues to be addressed? No, definitely not!
The burning questions and issues are not necessarily new - it is a set of aspects coming up again and again whenever experts meet and discuss in vitro dissolution:

· Is there a value or need for calibrator tablets?
· Is there a scientific justification for further standardization of dissolution media?
· Is there a scientific rationale for standardization of dissolution specifications (e.g. 75% in 15 min; 75% in 45 min), or do we need to treat each product on a case-by-case basis?
· How important is stage 3 testing (especially when being strict in post-marketing stability studies)?
· Are we really having a good understanding of which criteria would allow us to use in vitro dissolution as a surrogate for bioequivalence studies- Where are we too strict? Where are we not conservative enough?
· What level of in-vitro-in-vivo-correlation requirement is justified for validation of test method and specification? For which type of products?
· Is the basic concept of searching for the most discriminating in vitro method justified, when at the same time we continue to: face difficulties when applying low rotation speeds with apparatus 2 (and 1)? learn that typically, differences in vitro are more pronounced than those in bioavailability, when comparing similar products?
· Is there value in dissolution testing, when an in-vivo-in-vitro-comparison has proven a non-correlation (for any test condition considered reasonable)?
Which concepts for comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles are truly scientifically sound and still pragmatic-to-handle in terms of being easily applied and meaningful?
This list is not at all meant to be complete. Interesting enough, we are collecting more and more examples, many of them supporting established concepts, many other data sets raising these questions again. Sometimes we tend to question the basic concepts of dissolution testing (completely abstract, conventional method which we still believe to reflect gastro-intestinal processes?).
What are we really looking for? Maybe we need further scientific studies and investigations. But definitely, we need pragmatic approaches to make sure that we are staying on scientific ground, have sufficiently (adequately!) standardized tests in place, and still allow for enough flexibility to handle specific products or situations. Industry needs to focus on speed in registration of new products and in implementing post approval changes/variations. The objective is the safety and efficacy of our products for the patient. As long as regulatory requirements are illustrated in guidelines rather than bureaucratic directives, we will manage to the benefit of the patient, scientifically sound, and still economically feasible.
The SUPAC approach(es) and the FIP-Guideline are going into the right direction. Not necessarily all other recent proposals are obviously consolidating all available experience. Reoccurring same or similar questions may also be an indicator that, in some areas, we could be turning in circles rather than adding value.
A discussion forum for all the scientific, regulatory and practical application aspects is the best way to keep the dialogue running and to allow us to continue to make progress. DISSOLUTION TECHNOLOGIES is a very valuable forum in this regard.
Happy Anniversary!