dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT060499P15

MEETING REPORT:
FIP's Dissolution Expert Team Goes on the Road with "Dissolution '99"

Jennifer Dressman(1) and Johannes Kraemer(2)
1 University of Frankfurt, Germany,
2 Laboratory and Quality Services, Eschborn, Germany
 
Photos

The quality of pharmaceuticals in emerging countries is still of great concern to the FIP and WHO. In the West and Japan, the methodologies for testing bioavailability and the role that dissolution plays in this process are well established. In some cases, appropriate dissolution testing can even result in waiver of the need to perform bioequivalence studies in man. In other parts of the world, these concepts are still largely unexploited.

Under the leadership of Chair Martin Siewert, the FIP Working Group 4 (Dissolution testing) has initiated several new and important activities. As well as conducting conferences on scientific issues concerning dissolution testing of solid oral dosage forms and special dosage forms1, a workshop program teaching and demonstrating the latest dissolution techniques in emerging countries is currently in the pilot phase. As part of this program, experts from the Working Group are volunteering their time and effort to set up contacts with scientists and laboratory people in emerging countries in order to share their experience and expertise in the field of dissolution as widely as possible. The concept of the dissolution workshops, which are to be conducted in conjunction with the World Health Organization, is to combine lectures addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of dissolution with practical exercises - a so-called "hands-on" workshop. A trial run of this "Dissolution Road Tour" was held in Melbourne, Australia, on July 14th.

Dr. Bill Charman, Professor of Pharmaceutics at the Victorian College of Pharmacy (Monash University) welcomed members of the Working Group in his introduction to the"Dissolution 99 - Practical Applications and Regulatory Considerations" Workshop at the College of Pharmacy on July 14th, 1999. The first theme to be discussed was the choice of the right dissolution apparatus. In vivo verification of the in vitro specifications is the biopharmaceutical part of this choice, while the qualification of the compendial system to be used is the GMP part of the choice. Dr. Johannes Kraemer from LQS (Eschborn, Germany) shared his experiences with the USP's System Suitability Test with the participants. The FIP Guideline on Dissolution is widely recognized as being a consensus paper of dissolution experts from academia, regulatory authorities and industry. This Guideline prefers the use of pharmacopeial equipment rather than encouraging the use of alternative apparatus which show no clear advantage over the established equipment. This is a major step towards international harmonization of dissolution technologies.

Dr. Jennifer Dressman, Professor of Pharmaceutical Technology at the University of Frankfurt, presented results from her research concerning the choice of a suitable dissolution medium based on classification of the drug according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification Scheme (BCS). She also described potential ways of adapting these highly sophisticated media to the needs of routine quality control laboratories to provide the best system for discriminating non-bioequivalent batches. Setting specifications on the basis of in vivo results is already an FDA requirement, as set forth by Dr. Vinod Shah of the American Food and Drug Administration in Rockville, Maryland. According to FDA's recent Guidances for Biowaivers, dissolution testing of immediate and controlled release oral products in conjunction with scale-up and post-approval changes plays a key role in regulatory decision-making. FDA's attempts to accelerate the decision process are based on scientific research performed by universities in the USA, Sweden and Germany as well as internal activities. The implementation of the BCS in the current Guidances is the outcome of an ongoing worldwide dialogue with scientists from academia and the industry. Some results have already been implemented by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Agency (TGA) as reported by Dr. Anna Rickards, Canberra. She completed the lecture series by explaining TGA's activities in evaluating dissolution results in the light of submitted biostudies.

Dr. Chris Porter, also of the Victorian College of Pharmacy, took on the responsibility for the organization of the practical demonstrations, which were co-sponsored by Erweka GmbH, Germany. Mr. Eric Galia (Erweka) installed two of his company's dissolution systems, complete with on-line spectroscopy for these demonstrations, while Hoechst Marion Roussel donated the Lasix® tablets used to illustrate several features of dissolution testing. One of the demonstrations was to show the influence of buffer specifications on the dissolution of the active principal, furosemide, which is a weakly acidic compound. In addition, various aspects of qualification and calibration of the equipment were addressed. During the experiments all of the speakers were available in the laboratory to answer questions concerning the theoretical background as well as the practical aspects of dissolution testing.

The workshop thus provided a forum for the expanding discussion on the regulatory role of dissolution testing as well as practical knowledge and hands-on experience for the practicing scientist. The more than 60 participants of the workshop agreed that the day at the Victorian College of Pharmacy in Melbourne made them more aware of the increasing necessity to perform dissolution testing with an eye to bioequivalence considerations, and aided them greatly in the selection of appropriate apparatus, methodology and the application of theoretical principles to everyday dissolution testing.

1) "Dissolution Testing of Special Dosage Forms" Workshop, co-sponsored by the FIP Working Group on Dissolution Testing and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Pharmaceutical Sciences Group, September 2-3, 1999, London.