William Brown and Margareth Marques
The following questions
have been submitted by readers of Dissolution Technologies. Margareth
Marques, Ph.D. and Will Brown, United States Phamacopeia, authored
responses to each of the questions.
*Note: These are opinions and interpretations of the authors,
and are not necessarily the official viewpoints of the USP
Email for correspondence:
web@usp.org
Q
Is it necessary to use both USP Dissolution Calibrator,
Disintegrating Type,and USP Dissolution
Calibrator,Nondisintegrating Type, for suitability
test of dissolution equipment during performance
qualification?
A
The USP general chapter <711> Dissolution requires that a
demonstration of apparatus suitability include the testing of
the disintegrating as well as the nondisintegrating reference
standards tablets for each apparatus (basket or paddle) that
will be used in a USP monograph dissolution test.Use the
conditions and acceptance criteria stated in the data sheet for
the lot of USP Reference Standards being used,available at
http://www.usp.org/referenceStandards/useAndStorage/calibrators.html.
Q
How should the suitability of peak vessels be
demonstrated? Can the USP Dissolution Calibrator,
Disintegrating Type,and USP Dissolution Calibrator,
Nondisintegrating Type,be used?
A
Peak vessels are not compendial and their use must be
justified,showing an improvement over the compendial
vessels.There are no data available to demonstrate the suitability
of the USP dissolution calibrator tablets to evaluate the
peak vessels. It is up to the user to demonstrate,by any means,
the suitability of this equipment.Typical attributes will include
repeatability and reproducibility of dissolution results from a
well-characterized dosage form such as the USP RS tablets.
Q
When using automated sampling in the dissolution
test, is it appropriate to prime the filter prior to
sample withdrawal? Is it necessary to pre-wet filters
before sampling?
A
A filter material that is immersed in the dissolution
medium may still need to be conditioned to allow flow of the
medium in sampling or to eliminate interference due to
adsorption of the analyte.Typically,the autosampler can be
programmed to send the first portion withdrawn to waste,or
if sample is delivered to a UV-Vis flowcell,a lag time can be
programmed so the absorption is not measured until the
filter interference is overcome. If there is a problem with flow
of the medium through the filter,the filter can be conditioned
prior to placing it on the sampling cannula. If this is done and
the filter is immersed in the medium through the test period,
no flow problems due to physical interaction with the
medium should be encountered.Always bear in mind the
need to use the same filter type that was identified in the
method development and validation.
Q
Is it necessary to replace the dissolution medium
withdrawn when doing dissolution profiling?
A
The USP general chapter <711> Dissolution states “where
multiple sampling times are specified,replace the aliquots
withdrawn for analysis with equal volumes of fresh dissolution
media at 37 °C or,where it can be shown that replacement
of the medium is not necessary,correct for the volume
change in the calculation�.” You just need to be sure that
the sink conditions are still being satisfied and that you have
enough volume of medium in the vessels to have a good
agitation.
Q
How are the dissolution tolerances,the Q value,
established for noncompendial products?
A
The FDA approach is to make the Q or acceptance criteria
tight enough to separate the bioequivalent lots from the
bioinequivalent lots. Keep in mind that the dissolution test is
considered the eventual link from commercial batches to the
pivotal biobatch.The FDA does not consider going to Stage 2
and testing 6 more dosage units indicative of an unacceptable
batch. In fact,they encourage the tolerances or Q value
to be tight enough that going to Stage 2 around 20% of the
time is not unusual.The approach of the industry,however,
especially if the Quality Control or manufacturing departments
are the strongest voice when setting acceptance
criteria,is to choose the Q value in such a way that going to
Stage 2 is unusual and normally just 6 dosage units will be
tested on release testing.The data upon which the tolerances
are chosen will come from all lots contained in the documentation
submitted to the regulatory agency.This will typically
include the relevant clinical lots,manufacturing lots,and the
stability data from those lots,including those obtained from
the accelerated-condition studies.The stability studies should
have been done on lots packed in the final packaging configuration.
One approach that could be used to evaluate the
dissolution data from all these lots is to tabulate the results for
all the individual dosage forms at all time points.A visual
inspection of these tables can be performed to find the
lowest individual dissolution values at the primary time
points (usually 30 or 45 minutes). For example,if the lowest
point at 30 minutes is 81% dissolved,then select a Q value
that this value of 81% will pass when it is at Stage 1 (not less
than or equal to Q + 5%). A Q value of 75% could be chosen,
so at Stage 1 (Q + 5% = 80%),the 81% will pass.Other
approaches include statistical evaluation of the data points.
A visual representation of the data in the form of histograms
gives a very good representation of the distribution of the
data.
Q
How is the volume of the dissolution medium
required in a dissolution test defined?
A
The volume of dissolution medium to be used is defined
by the sink condition. Determine the volume of dissolution
medium necessary to obtain a saturated solution of your drug
considering the highest strength of your product,and try to
work as far as possible from this volume. In general,the
volume is three times the volume to obtain a saturated condition,
but you can work with 5 times or even 10 times this
volume.The volume will be product dependent.
Q
Could any tablet other than the USP Reference
Standard tablets be used to verify the suitability of
the dissolution equipment?
A
The USP calibrator tablets are especially sensitive to
certain deviations in the dissolution equipment,mainly vibration
and deaeration but also vessel geometry. It is not easy to
determine vibration mechanically in your equipment
because it should be measured where the dosage form sits
during the test. In addition,USP calibrator tablets are highly
characterized.These tablets are evaluated through collaborative
studies with participants from all over the world. If any
other tablet will be used,a demonstration of the reproducibility
of its performance under controlled conditions as
well as its ability to detect perturbed conditions or deviations
in your dissolution system is a logical necessity.
Q
When should baskets or paddles be used?
A
Baskets are generally used for dosage forms that float or
that stick in different regions in the dissolution vessel. It is
necessary to verify that the formulation is not clogging the
mesh wire.The USP general chapter <711> Dissolution calls
for baskets with wire openings of 0.36�0.44 mm.Other openings
could be used if properly justified and validated. If the
formulation clogs the wire,paddles could be used,but sinkers
will be required to keep the dosage unit in a fixed position
underneath the agitation device. Paddles may be used with
capsules,tablets,and suspensions.