Reader's
response:
Hollow Shaft Sampling With Fiber Optics
Schatz C., Ulmschneider M., Altermatt
R., and Marrer S.
Pharmaceutical Quality
Control and Quality Assurance, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel,
Switzerland
email for correspondence: caspar.schatz@roche.com
In the Question and Answer section of Dissolution
Technologies (November 1999) [1] the final question raised the
issue of hollow shaft sampling with fiber optics. The answer explained
that the USP Dissolution and Bioavailability Subcommittee was
unable to determine whether this technique is USP compliant due
to lack of sufficient supporting data. Since considerable effort
has been devoted to developing a semi-automated dissolution tester
with fiber optics [2, 3] this is a good moment to present the
experimental results obtained as preliminary evidence for evaluating
fiber optic sampling in the hollow shaft.
All dissolution tests were performed
with apparatus 2 (Sotax AT 7 smart, Sotax AG, Allschwil, Switzerland)
equipped with hollow shafts and media thermostatted at 37.0 °C
as well as degassed by helium sparging or sonication under vacuum
[4]. A DAD spectrometer (Tidas II, J & M Analytische Mess-
und Regeltechnik GmbH, Aalen, Germany) and a scanning spectrometer
(Varian Cary 50, Varian International AG, Zug, Switzerland) were
connected to fiber optic probes (Ultra Mini TS 10 mm + 2 LL UV
Li/SMA, Hellma GmbH & Co., Müllheim/ Baden, Germany)
with pathlengths of 10 mm. As shown in Figure 1, the absorption
readings with the fiber optic probes were taken in the vessel
in position (B) and in the hollow shaft in position (A). The fiber
optical measuring position (B) in the vessel corresponded to the
location for manual sampling (C).
System stability was examined by
stirring the paddle (50 rpm) with the fiber optic probe in its
hollow shaft (A) for 12 hours in deionized water. The identical
transmission spectra recorded during the experiment demonstrated
the suitability of the arrangement.
The suitability of the hollow shaft
sampling was examined with the following procedures.
Using the DAD spectrometer, a method
comparison between in situ measurement of the amount of dissolved
active substance with fiber optics in the hollow shaft (A) and
conventional manual sampling (C), followed by filtration, was
performed with six anticoagulant tablets. The fiber optic method
used two wavelengths - one to determine the active substance at
an absorption maximum and one to correct the baseline offset due
to the turbidity from undissolved tablet components [5, 6] - and
was validated with regard to linearity (r = 0.99932), precision
(RSD = 1.5%) and accuracy (100.4% recovery) [7, 8]. The A(1%,
1 cm) was used for quantification. The mean of 90.1% (±
7.3%) determined by fiber optics in the hollow shaft and the manual
sampling mean of 88.8% (± 7.4%) did not differ significantly
(p = 95%) [9].
As shown in Figure 1, one anticoagulant tablet dissolution profile was measured with two fiber optic probes in position (A) and (B) simultaneously. In Figure 2 it can be seen that the two sampling positions led to identical profiles.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
In order to refer to an international standard, dissolution tests with USP calibrator tablets were performed in accordance with Refs. 10 and 11 using the scanning spectrometer. The vessels were stirred at 100 rpm for non-disintegrating tablets and at 50 rpm for disintegrating tablets. Again the amount of dissolved active substance from six tablets per dissolution test was determined by fiber optics in the hollow shaft (A) and manual sampling (C), using a one-point calibration in both cases. For the fiber optical determination of the amount of dissolved substance the two-wavelength method already mentioned was performed. Whereas a validated method was used for the manual sampling [10], only the linearity (r = 0.99950) was verfied for the quantification with fiber optics [8]. The results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Results of the dissolution
tests performed with USP calibrator tablets
|
||
Sampling | Mean ± 1 SD [%] | Range [%] |
Hollow shaft | 19.4 ± 0.4 | 18.9 20.1 |
Manual | 19.5 ± 0.6 | 18.7 20.4 |
USP dissolution calibrators, disintegrating, lot L | ||
Sampling | Mean ± 1 SD [%] | Range [%] |
Hollow shaft | 45.3 ± 1.4 | 43.2 47.1 |
Manual | 43.8 ± 2.8 | 39.2 45.0 |
All results lie within the USP
acceptance limits of 1726% for the non-disintegrating type
tablets and 3848% for the disintegrating type tablets and
there is no significant difference between manual sampling (C)
in the vessel and hollow shaft sampling (A) with fiber optics
(p = 95%) [9].
The experiments confirmed that scanning and DAD spectrometers
are suitable for measuring the amount of dissolved active substance
with fiber optics using the two-wavelength method. It was also
shown that sampling with fiber optics in the hollow shaft (A)
is equivalent to manual (B) or fiber optic sampling (C) in the
vessel. Although only a limited number of experiments was performed,
there is strong evidence that sampling by fiber optics in the
hollow shaft of apparatus 2 should be regarded as USP compliant.
[1] Mirza T., Question and Answer
Section, Dissolution Technologies, 6 (4), 11 (1999)
[2] Aldridge P.K., Kostek L.J., In Situ Fiber Optic Dissolution
Analysis, Dissolution Technologies, 2 (4), 10-11 (1995)
[3] Bynum K.C., Kraft E., Pocreva J., Ciurczak E.W., Palermo P.,
In Situ Dissolution Testing Using a UV Fiber Optic Probe Dissolution
System, Dissolution Technologies, 6 (4), 11 (1999)
[4] Rohrs B.R., Stelzer D.J., Deaeration Techniques for Dissolution
Media, Dissolution Technologies, 2 (2) 1-9 (1995)
[5] Schatz C., Internal Communication about Soft Gelatin Capsules,
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel (1999)
[6] Schatz C., Internal Communication about Benzodiazepine Tablets,
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel (1999)
[7] International Conference on Harmonization, Validation of Analytical
Procedures: Methodology, ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline Q2B
(1995)
[8] Pharma Switzerland, Quality Assurance and Quality Control,
Internal Guideline on Validation of Analytical Methods, F. Hoffmann-La
Roche Ltd., Basel (1998)
[9] Doerfel K., Statistik in der analytischen Chemie, Deutscher
Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie GmbH, Leipzig (1990)
[10] Pharma Switzerland, Quality Assurance and Quality Control,
Internal SOP on Qualification in Dissolution testing, F. Hoffmann-La
Roche Ltd., Basel (1999)
[11] The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., Note on
USP Dissolution Calibrator Tablets, Rockville (1997)